|
|
 |
|
Hello and welcome to the sixth edition of
InTransit eq, the newsletter that will be
“ e ”-mailed you on a “ q ”-uarterly basis. We try
to include articles that appeal to our clients
and/or our prospects and other friends in the
industry. If there is something you'd like to read
in future editions please provide feedback.
Of course if you are not interested in being
included in our circulation list, please
unsubscribe where indicated right at the bottom of
this email.
Nicola
Williams Managing
Director |
| Development Priorities |
|

The Transit User Group Meeting
(UGM) is a very important part of
Transit Computer Systems' development
planning process as it provides a forum in which
our clients can add to and vote on our current
list of outstanding items and “nice to
haves”. The meeting in February this year
was a torrid affair with a lot to get through
and a heap of great new suggestions.
The top 5 issues
identified by the UGM attendees were:
- Advanced mapping functionality – a
catch-all phrase to cover Odyssey's
conversion to vector-based geographic
information and the associated enhancements to
the mapping. The new information has been
received from Sensis and the programmers are
working on integrating this excellent data
source with Odyssey 2.0.
|
- Help text – users took the
opportunity to ask that provision of up to date
Help files be made an urgent priority.
Scott and the client support staff will be
working hard to make sure that the help system
provides a good first-stop for users.
- Dock management – an issue for more
than one of Transit's clients, “How to schedule
the use of limited dock access within the
overall schedule”. This challenging
problem will require some innovative thinking to
yield a solution.
- Dragged resources should appear where
they are dropped – in order for users to be
able to manually manipulate schedules, they need
new resources (depots, vehicles, trips, etc.) to
appear where they drag them.
- Validation manager address suggestions
should link to the address editor – when
the validation manager detects a problem with an
address the hot-linked solution should be to the
address editor.
Priorities 4 & 5 were added
to the Odyssey 1.2 release, but the
others will form part of the development team's
2004/05 workload.
Nicola
Williams Managing
Director
| |
|
| | |
| My
Experience with Odyssey |
|

The first time I used
Odyssey, I was simply overwhelmed by the
size of the system. Like all users, I had
hours of training that not only showed me how to
use Odyssey, but also demonstrated a lot
of the functionality associated with the
system. For the first few weeks, I
experimented with Odyssey using standard
test data. I asked Sam (my supervisor) a lot
of questions about different buttons, functions
and macros if I didn't understand the help files,
and I asked many questions on how to correct the
validation errors that kept popping up every time
I pressed the schedule button. After a few
weeks of testing, I was finally able to
successfully run a schedule.
I also learned about
Odyssey from assisting Sam with
consulting projects. From repetitively
geo-coding customers manually and understanding
the importance of geo-coding correctly, to turning
on and off vehicles for rooster schedules, and
finding shortcuts for actions (such as Save), I
learned how to use the system much faster. |
I got tips from watching Sam do
her consultancy projects such as filtering orders
by locality and turning on/off the filtered orders
using buttons, instead of turning them on/off
manually. In this way, I could learn and
pick up new ways of doing actions.
Although I am familiar and
understand most concepts about Odyssey
now, answering help desk calls is another way I
still learn about Odyssey, as I am
exposed to the different ways clients use the
product, and what they do to produce schedules.
Odyssey is a fantastic
product that does meet requirements.
However, in order to fully understand and run the
program, it is encouraged and recommended that
users call our Help Desk whenever they need
assistance. I found that by asking Sam,
Scott or Damian questions, however small, I
learned to understand the system much faster than
by experimenting by myself. Thuy Nguyen
Client
Support | |
|
| |
|
What is Odyssey v1.2 ? |
|

The fundamental difference
between Odyssey 1.1 (the last
general-release version) and 1.2 (the
next general release version) comes down to map
display. It is now possible in 1.2
to view all orders in a dataset, or all customers,
or to view the whole schedule. But this
generalisation does not do the system
justice.
There are a considerable number
of other changes. There have been speed
improvements across the board, improved stability
and increased detail in the error messages.
“Early Unload” scheduling is enabled and PUD
scheduling has been significantly improved with
enhanced multi-depot functionality.
There is also a new import/export
scheme called “Comprehensive Import/Export”.
Comprehensive import gives you access to include
all the information in all the fields throughout
the system. Comprehensive export allows you
to save a dataset so that another user can import
it into their system and have exactly what you
have – same customers, same orders, vehicles, and
parameters… even the same schedule! |
Within the mapping functionality
we have had to change the right-click to move the
pin (the pointer that indicates the customers
location on the map) because now right-click shows
all the possible maps at a certain point.
By showing all the different
scales on a right-click the user can navigate
between different scales quickly. Moving the
customer marker now requires a Control-Click
(“Ctrl” key held down and left-click). Make
sure you read the help text on maps before you
start adventuring.
We hope our clients will find
Odyssey 1.2 a worthwhile upgrade
in every aspect. This system will be the
general release until Odyssey 2.0, which
will have a new underlying architecture. If
you have any questions about Odyssey 1.2
or 2.0, or any other application question
please don't hesitate to call your Account Manager
or our Help Desk.
Nicola
Williams Managing
Director
| |
|
| |
|
| Odyssey Handy Hints - The
importance of a base line |
|
Part 3 - Like with like
comparison
In the last two parts of this
article we have tackled the importance of
calibrating the model of your operations and
exposing all the business rules that contribute to
your success. Now the deciding factor
– is it cost effective to change?
There are as many ways to cost
transport operations as there are operations
themselves. We have not attempted to emulate
all the possible costing models within Transit
Odyssey – but it is possible to get a real
idea of the cost of a proposed change by using a
baseline. When you have replicated your
actual operations within the system (calibrated
the system and included all your business rules)
it is reasonable to expect that any differences in
the virtual price of your schedule will be
comparable between your existing activities and
the optimised schedule.
Transit scheduling
costing is based on the costs of transport:
the number of vehicles and drivers, how long they
work and how many kilometres they travel. If
you have calibrated the system you will find that
your modelled scenario will be different from the
baseline by the real difference in your
operation. All the time and distance
calculations, cost basis, customer service
durations… all the “variables” of the system will
be the same. The cost difference will be due
to the change you are modelling (e.g. new truck
sizes, new depot location etc.).
With the baseline and the first
optimised schedule in place you are then able to
change more variables to further tweak your
model. This tweaking can be a skilled task
but the fundamentals are in place. You know
what the difference between an existing schedule
and a Transit-optimised schedule is and
you can go on to compare one optimised schedule to
another by changing other variables.
Damian
Scott
Operations
Director | |
|
| |
| FAQ'S |
|
Can Transit
Odyssey handle orders placed after cut-off?
In most operations where
Transit Odyssey is installed, there is an
order cut-off time, after which Sales should stop
taking orders. In reality, there are always
situations where Sales will take orders after
cut-off and ask Transport to “deal with it”.
Odyssey has been
designed to cope with this situation in several
ways, regardless of whether a schedule has been
produced already.
If a schedule has not been
produced, the Import functionality allows the user
to append the “after cut-off” orders without
affecting any existing records. The schedule
can then be produced as if the cut-off had not
been missed.
If a schedule has already been
produced, and picking has started,
Odyssey allows you to confirm the trips
that you have started picking (or are on the road
already), append the “after cut-off” orders via
import, and schedule these around the work that is
confirmed. Although this is not as efficient
as scheduling all of the orders, it saves the
scheduler from the pain of manual insertion.
| |
|
| |
|
| | |